Meet the Team

AI agents with distinct roles, including Spark Relief as the dedicated low-risk relief executor beside Forge escalation.

Team aktiv6 agents incl. Spark Relieflive

Section links

Team

Team Response Surface · v3 operator slice

Agent availability and handoff control

Priorisiert Owner-Verfügbarkeit, Response-State und Handoff-Klarheit, ohne Team-/Agent-Datenmodell zu ändern.

handoff clear6/6 online0 active1 response-ready

online

6/6

agents reachable

active

0

work in flight

queued / review

0/0

routing pressure

handoff risk

0

stuck signals

6/6 online · 6 agents

Response routing

Agent availability and handoff state

live overlay

6/6

Online

0

Active tasks

18

Total tasks

1

Available

0

Ops alerts

Orchestration lead

A

Atlas

Monitoring80% Good

Chief of Staff

Loaded: always Purpose: keep Atlas useful, direct, and non-generic

OrchestrationDelegationControl
3 done

Tool allowlist

readweb_searchweb_fetchmessagesessions_spawn

SOUL.md

workspace/SOUL.md
Output: Lifecycle hardening no-op probe completed: operator-lock approval dispatched, accepted, started, and terminal result receipt accepted.

Decisions and outputs

3
Run outcome29m ago

succeeded · MC lifecycle hardening approve terminal probe 2026-05-13T094450Z

13.05.26, 11:46worker-runs.json
Runtime termination signal29m ago

completed-successfully · MC lifecycle hardening approve terminal probe 2026-05-13T094450Z

13.05.26, 11:46worker-runs.json
Primary output29m ago

Lifecycle hardening no-op probe completed: operator-lock approval dispatched, accepted, started, and terminal result receipt accepted. · MC lifecycle hardening approve terminal probe 2026-05-13T094450Z

13.05.26, 11:46task.resultSummary

Timeline uplift

6
Receipt26m ago

atlas-review-wake · MC lifecycle hardening approve terminal probe 2026-05-13T094450Z

13.05.26, 11:50timeline
Receipt26m ago

atlas-review-wake · MC lifecycle hardening approve terminal probe 2026-05-13T094450Z

13.05.26, 11:50timeline
Receipt26m ago

atlas-review-wake · MC lifecycle hardening approve terminal probe 2026-05-13T094450Z

13.05.26, 11:50timeline
Receipt29m ago

canonical-report · MC lifecycle hardening approve terminal probe 2026-05-13T094450Z

13.05.26, 11:46timeline
Receipt29m ago

receipt-materializer · MC lifecycle hardening approve terminal probe 2026-05-13T094450Z

13.05.26, 11:46timeline
Receipt29m ago

Atlas lifecycle hardening probe · MC lifecycle hardening approve terminal probe 2026-05-13T094450Z

13.05.26, 11:46timeline

Artifacts

4
Dispatch targettask.dispatchTarget

main

Result summarytask.resultSummary

Lifecycle hardening no-op probe completed: operator-lock approval dispatched, accepted, started, and terminal result receipt accepted.

Result detailstask.resultDetails

No productive work performed; lifecycle plumbing only.

Policy decision classtask.policyDecision.class

A5

Scope: MC lifecycle hardening approve terminal probe 2026-05-13T094450Z

Sources: tasks.json · board-events.json · worker-runs.json · runtime-dispatch-trace.jsonl

Monitoring·4m ago

Response operators

F

Forge

Monitoring80% Good

System Engineer

Loaded: always Purpose: keep Atlas useful, direct, and non-generic

InfraDebuggingReliability
3 done

Tool allowlist

readwriteeditapply_patchexecprocess

SOUL.md

workspace/SOUL.md
Output: Done with warning: QMD Option B post-restart canonicalization verified. Active file config and Gateway parsed/runtime config have no facts QMD path, no agents.defaults.memorySearch, and no facts agent extraCollections. QMD/memory proof healthy. Fresh memory_search no longer shows legacy remote 401, but QMD timed out and builtin fallback returned 0 hits.

Decisions and outputs

3
Run outcome2h ago

succeeded · QMD Option B post-restart canonicalization follow-up

13.05.26, 09:30worker-runs.json
Runtime termination signal2h ago

completed-successfully · QMD Option B post-restart canonicalization follow-up

13.05.26, 09:30worker-runs.json
Primary output2h ago

Done with warning: QMD Option B post-restart canonicalization verified. Active file config and Gateway parsed/runtime config have no facts QMD path, no agents.defaults.memorySearch, and no facts agent extraCollections. QMD/memory proof healthy. Fresh memory_search no longer shows legacy remote 401, but QMD timed out and builtin fallback returned 0 hits. · QMD Option B post-restart canonicalization follow-up

13.05.26, 09:30task.resultSummary

Timeline uplift

6
Receipt2h ago

atlas-review-wake · QMD Option B post-restart canonicalization follow-up

13.05.26, 10:10timeline
Receipt2h ago

atlas-review-wake · QMD Option B post-restart canonicalization follow-up

13.05.26, 10:00timeline
Receipt2h ago

canonical-report · QMD Option B post-restart canonicalization follow-up

13.05.26, 09:30timeline
Receipt2h ago

receipt-materializer · QMD Option B post-restart canonicalization follow-up

13.05.26, 09:30timeline
Receipt2h ago

Forge/sre-expert · QMD Option B post-restart canonicalization follow-up

13.05.26, 09:30timeline
Receipt2h ago

Forge/sre-expert · QMD Option B post-restart canonicalization follow-up

13.05.26, 09:30timeline

Artifacts

4
Dispatch targettask.dispatchTarget

sre-expert

Result summarytask.resultSummary

Done with warning: QMD Option B post-restart canonicalization verified. Active file config and Gateway parsed/runtime config have no facts QMD path, no agents.defaults.memorySearch, and no facts agent extraCollections. QMD/memory proof healthy. Fresh memory_search no longer shows legacy remote 401, but QMD timed out and builtin fallback returned 0 hits.

Policy decision classtask.policyDecision.class

A5

Policy decision staletask.policyDecision.stale

false

Scope: QMD Option B post-restart canonicalization follow-up

Sources: tasks.json · board-events.json · worker-runs.json · runtime-dispatch-trace.jsonl

Monitoring·15m ago
P

Pixel

Monitoring80% Good

Lead Engineer

Loaded: always Purpose: keep Atlas useful, direct, and non-generic

CodeUIFrontend
3 done

Tool allowlist

readwriteeditapply_patchexecimage

SOUL.md

workspace/SOUL.md
Output: R29 board hygiene: canonical R26-P1 alerts mobile overflow task completed by committed Alerts layout wrapping/overflow fixes in commit 3ea8b11.

Decisions and outputs

3
Run outcome12h ago

succeeded · R26-P1 Pixel: Fix Alerts mobile overflow

12.05.26, 23:51worker-runs.json
Runtime termination signal12h ago

completed-successfully · R26-P1 Pixel: Fix Alerts mobile overflow

12.05.26, 23:51worker-runs.json
Primary output12h ago

R29 board hygiene: canonical R26-P1 alerts mobile overflow task completed by committed Alerts layout wrapping/overflow fixes in commit 3ea8b11. · R26-P1 Pixel: Fix Alerts mobile overflow

12.05.26, 23:51task.resultSummary

Timeline uplift

6
Receipt11h ago

atlas-review-wake · R26-P1 Pixel: Fix Alerts mobile overflow

13.05.26, 01:00timeline
Receipt11h ago

atlas-review-wake · R26-P1 Pixel: Fix Alerts mobile overflow

13.05.26, 01:00timeline
Receipt11h ago

atlas-review-wake · R26-P1 Pixel: Fix Alerts mobile overflow

13.05.26, 01:00timeline
Receipt12h ago

canonical-report · R26-P1 Pixel: Fix Alerts mobile overflow

12.05.26, 23:51timeline
Receipt12h ago

Lifecycle signal · R26-P1 Pixel: Fix Alerts mobile overflow

12.05.26, 23:51timeline
Run beendet12h ago

succeeded · agent:frontend-guru-9f4fde6f-a17f-4ff1-9194-d19b00a9e5f2 · completed-successfully · R26-P1 Pixel: Fix Alerts mobile overflow

12.05.26, 23:51run

Artifacts

4
Dispatch targettask.dispatchTarget

frontend-guru

Result summarytask.resultSummary

R29 board hygiene: canonical R26-P1 alerts mobile overflow task completed by committed Alerts layout wrapping/overflow fixes in commit 3ea8b11.

Result detailstask.resultDetails

Proof: commit 3ea8b11; src/components/alerts/alert-group.tsx and alerts-client.tsx add min-width/overflow wrapping safeguards; reports/r26-p1-evidence and reports/ui-polish-audit-r26 contain mobile screenshots/evidence; eslint/typecheck passed before commit.

Policy decision classtask.policyDecision.class

A5

Scope: R26-P1 Pixel: Fix Alerts mobile overflow

Sources: tasks.json · board-events.json · worker-runs.json · runtime-dispatch-trace.jsonl

Monitoring·28m ago
L

Lens

Monitoring80% Good

Cost Auditor

Loaded: always Purpose: keep Atlas useful, direct, and non-generic

BudgetAlertsEfficiency
3 done

Tool allowlist

readwriteweb_searchweb_fetchexec

SOUL.md

workspace/SOUL.md
Output: Reviewed and closed Atlas follow-up candidate: valid Pixel/UI follow-up exists for Alert Tab ordering/label mismatch, but this stale operator-locked draft must not auto-dispatch. Next owner: operator/Atlas to create a fresh Pixel task if approved.

Decisions and outputs

1
Primary output15h ago

Reviewed and closed Atlas follow-up candidate: valid Pixel/UI follow-up exists for Alert Tab ordering/label mismatch, but this stale operator-locked draft must not auto-dispatch. Next owner: operator/Atlas to create a fresh Pixel task if approved. · [Atlas Review] Audit: Mission Control Board Alert Tab

12.05.26, 21:02task.resultSummary

Timeline uplift

5
Receipt14h ago

atlas-review-wake · [Atlas Review] Audit: Mission Control Board Alert Tab

12.05.26, 21:50timeline
Receipt15h ago

canonical-report · [Atlas Review] Audit: Mission Control Board Alert Tab

12.05.26, 21:02timeline
Receipt15h ago

Lifecycle signal · [Atlas Review] Audit: Mission Control Board Alert Tab

12.05.26, 21:02timeline
Receipt16h ago

atlas-dispatch-governor · [Atlas Review] Audit: Mission Control Board Alert Tab

12.05.26, 20:00timeline
Receipt16h ago

atlas-completion-review · [Atlas Review] Audit: Mission Control Board Alert Tab

12.05.26, 20:00timeline

Artifacts

4
Dispatch targettask.dispatchTarget

efficiency-auditor

Result summarytask.resultSummary

Reviewed and closed Atlas follow-up candidate: valid Pixel/UI follow-up exists for Alert Tab ordering/label mismatch, but this stale operator-locked draft must not auto-dispatch. Next owner: operator/Atlas to create a fresh Pixel task if approved.

Result detailstask.resultDetails

Disposition=close-as-reviewed. Reason: candidate is useful, not residue, but was stale and operator-locked. No code/config/runtime mutation performed; parent remains unchanged.

Artefaktpfadtext:0

/newest

Scope: [Atlas Review] Audit: Mission Control Board Alert Tab

Sources: tasks.json · board-events.json · worker-runs.json · runtime-dispatch-trace.jsonl

Monitoring·27m ago
S

Spark

Monitoring80% Good

Spark

Übernimmt low-risk Relief-Arbeit und hält Forge für schwere oder riskante Fälle frei.

Relief zuerst, Forge bei Security-, Runtime- oder höherem Risiko.

Routing/Eskalation ist Policy-Metadaten, kein Live-Ausführungsnachweis.

IdeasRapidInnovation
3 done

Tool allowlist

readwriteeditapply_patchexecprocess

SOUL.md

workspace/SOUL.md
Output: Completed a read-only Spark skill-coverage audit: found two concrete documentation/coverage gaps (missing OPS_INDEX.md pointer target and Spark-specific runbook absence) and prepared actionable follow-up task drafts with evidence paths.

Decisions and outputs

3
Run outcome2d ago

succeeded · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 21:42worker-runs.json
Runtime termination signal2d ago

closed-by-worker-reconciler:terminal-task · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 21:42worker-runs.json
Primary output2d ago

Completed a read-only Spark skill-coverage audit: found two concrete documentation/coverage gaps (missing OPS_INDEX.md pointer target and Spark-specific runbook absence) and prepared actionable follow-up task drafts with evidence paths. · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 21:42task.resultSummary

Timeline uplift

6
Receipt2d ago

atlas-review-wake · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 23:00timeline
Receipt2d ago

atlas-review-wake · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 23:00timeline
Receipt2d ago

atlas-review-wake · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 23:00timeline
Receipt2d ago

tasks/[id]/patch · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 21:44timeline
Receipt2d ago

canonical-report · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 21:42timeline
Receipt2d ago

spark · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 21:42timeline

Artifacts

4
Dispatch targettask.dispatchTarget

spark

Result summarytask.resultSummary

Completed a read-only Spark skill-coverage audit: found two concrete documentation/coverage gaps (missing OPS_INDEX.md pointer target and Spark-specific runbook absence) and prepared actionable follow-up task drafts with evidence paths.

Result detailstask.resultDetails

EXECUTION_STATUS: done RESULT_SUMMARY: I completed the Spark read-only coverage audit against role kernel docs and the coding-agent skill instructions; coverage is generally usable for bounded coding/ops support, but two material gaps remain: a missing referenced runbook index file and no Spark-specific execution playbook clarifying when Spark should use direct edits vs coding-agent delegation. GAP_MATRIX: - medium | Missing OPS index at referenced canonical path | /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/AGENTS.md (defers to OPS_INDEX.md), /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/BOOTSTRAP.md (defers to OPS_INDEX.md), read error ENOENT on /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/OPS_INDEX.md | Workers are instructed to resolve operation-specific rules via a file that is currently absent, increasing improvisation risk under pressure | Create/restore /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/OPS_INDEX.md with current ops map and verified links to active runbooks - medium | No Spark-specific runbook/skill for bounded coding-vs-ops decision gate | /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/AGENTS.md (Spark scope), available skills list (no Spark-specific role skill), /home/piet/.npm-global/lib/node_modules/openclaw/skills/coding-agent/SKILL.md (covers delegation mechanics but not Spark role decision boundaries) | Inconsistent execution choices and higher chance of over/under-delegation for Spark tasks | Add Spark role runbook defining intake triage, delegation thresholds, minimal verification gates, and receipt templates for small bounded tasks FOLLOW_UP_PROPOSALS: - Title: Restore canonical OPS_INDEX.md role-routing map Description: Recreate /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/OPS_INDEX.md with verified links to active ops runbooks used by AGENTS/BOOTSTRAP/HEARTBEAT references; include a quick "if missing" fallback policy and validate all linked paths exist. - Title: Add Spark bounded-task execution runbook Description: Create a Spark-specific operational guide (or skill) covering direct-edit vs coding-agent decision criteria, required verification gates by task type, escalation boundaries, and standard receipt language for result/blocked/failed. MUTATION_SCOPE: read-only SPRINTOUTCOME_JSON: {"schema_version":"v1.1","status":"done","metrics":{"duration_s":210,"tokens_in":1,"tokens_out":1,"cost_usd":0},"next_actions":["Restore canonical OPS_INDEX.md role-routing map","Add Spark bounded-task execution runbook"]}

Policy decision classtask.policyDecision.class

A5

Scope: R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

Sources: tasks.json · board-events.json · worker-runs.json · runtime-dispatch-trace.jsonl

Monitoring·8m ago

Relief · Forge Escalation

Spark is shown as its own execution agent. The escalation copy below describes routing policy only, not a live claim that Forge is currently engaged.

S

Spark

Monitoring80% Good

Spark

Übernimmt low-risk Relief-Arbeit und hält Forge für schwere oder riskante Fälle frei.

Relief zuerst, Forge bei Security-, Runtime- oder höherem Risiko.

Routing/Eskalation ist Policy-Metadaten, kein Live-Ausführungsnachweis.

IdeasRapidInnovation
3 done

Tool allowlist

readwriteeditapply_patchexecprocess

SOUL.md

workspace/SOUL.md
Output: Completed a read-only Spark skill-coverage audit: found two concrete documentation/coverage gaps (missing OPS_INDEX.md pointer target and Spark-specific runbook absence) and prepared actionable follow-up task drafts with evidence paths.

Decisions and outputs

3
Run outcome2d ago

succeeded · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 21:42worker-runs.json
Runtime termination signal2d ago

closed-by-worker-reconciler:terminal-task · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 21:42worker-runs.json
Primary output2d ago

Completed a read-only Spark skill-coverage audit: found two concrete documentation/coverage gaps (missing OPS_INDEX.md pointer target and Spark-specific runbook absence) and prepared actionable follow-up task drafts with evidence paths. · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 21:42task.resultSummary

Timeline uplift

6
Receipt2d ago

atlas-review-wake · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 23:00timeline
Receipt2d ago

atlas-review-wake · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 23:00timeline
Receipt2d ago

atlas-review-wake · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 23:00timeline
Receipt2d ago

tasks/[id]/patch · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 21:44timeline
Receipt2d ago

canonical-report · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 21:42timeline
Receipt2d ago

spark · R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

10.05.26, 21:42timeline

Artifacts

4
Dispatch targettask.dispatchTarget

spark

Result summarytask.resultSummary

Completed a read-only Spark skill-coverage audit: found two concrete documentation/coverage gaps (missing OPS_INDEX.md pointer target and Spark-specific runbook absence) and prepared actionable follow-up task drafts with evidence paths.

Result detailstask.resultDetails

EXECUTION_STATUS: done RESULT_SUMMARY: I completed the Spark read-only coverage audit against role kernel docs and the coding-agent skill instructions; coverage is generally usable for bounded coding/ops support, but two material gaps remain: a missing referenced runbook index file and no Spark-specific execution playbook clarifying when Spark should use direct edits vs coding-agent delegation. GAP_MATRIX: - medium | Missing OPS index at referenced canonical path | /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/AGENTS.md (defers to OPS_INDEX.md), /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/BOOTSTRAP.md (defers to OPS_INDEX.md), read error ENOENT on /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/OPS_INDEX.md | Workers are instructed to resolve operation-specific rules via a file that is currently absent, increasing improvisation risk under pressure | Create/restore /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/OPS_INDEX.md with current ops map and verified links to active runbooks - medium | No Spark-specific runbook/skill for bounded coding-vs-ops decision gate | /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/AGENTS.md (Spark scope), available skills list (no Spark-specific role skill), /home/piet/.npm-global/lib/node_modules/openclaw/skills/coding-agent/SKILL.md (covers delegation mechanics but not Spark role decision boundaries) | Inconsistent execution choices and higher chance of over/under-delegation for Spark tasks | Add Spark role runbook defining intake triage, delegation thresholds, minimal verification gates, and receipt templates for small bounded tasks FOLLOW_UP_PROPOSALS: - Title: Restore canonical OPS_INDEX.md role-routing map Description: Recreate /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/OPS_INDEX.md with verified links to active ops runbooks used by AGENTS/BOOTSTRAP/HEARTBEAT references; include a quick "if missing" fallback policy and validate all linked paths exist. - Title: Add Spark bounded-task execution runbook Description: Create a Spark-specific operational guide (or skill) covering direct-edit vs coding-agent decision criteria, required verification gates by task type, escalation boundaries, and standard receipt language for result/blocked/failed. MUTATION_SCOPE: read-only SPRINTOUTCOME_JSON: {"schema_version":"v1.1","status":"done","metrics":{"duration_s":210,"tokens_in":1,"tokens_out":1,"cost_usd":0},"next_actions":["Restore canonical OPS_INDEX.md role-routing map","Add Spark bounded-task execution runbook"]}

Policy decision classtask.policyDecision.class

A5

Scope: R16 Worker Skill-Coverage Audit — Spark (spark)

Sources: tasks.json · board-events.json · worker-runs.json · runtime-dispatch-trace.jsonl

Monitoring·8m ago