Agents

main

Lifecycle hardening no-op probe completed: operator-lock approval dispatched, accepted, started, and terminal result receipt accepted.

No productive work performed; lifecycle plumbing only.

A5

sre-expert

Done with warning: QMD Option B post-restart canonicalization verified. Active file config and Gateway parsed/runtime config have no facts QMD path, no agents.defaults.memorySearch, and no facts agent extraCollections. QMD/memory proof healthy. Fresh memory_search no longer shows legacy remote 401, but QMD timed out and builtin fallback returned 0 hits.

A5

false

frontend-guru

R29 board hygiene: canonical R26-P1 alerts mobile overflow task completed by committed Alerts layout wrapping/overflow fixes in commit 3ea8b11.

Proof: commit 3ea8b11; src/components/alerts/alert-group.tsx and alerts-client.tsx add min-width/overflow wrapping safeguards; reports/r26-p1-evidence and reports/ui-polish-audit-r26 contain mobile screenshots/evidence; eslint/typecheck passed before commit.

A5

efficiency-auditor

Reviewed and closed Atlas follow-up candidate: valid Pixel/UI follow-up exists for Alert Tab ordering/label mismatch, but this stale operator-locked draft must not auto-dispatch. Next owner: operator/Atlas to create a fresh Pixel task if approved.

Disposition=close-as-reviewed. Reason: candidate is useful, not residue, but was stale and operator-locked. No code/config/runtime mutation performed; parent remains unchanged.

/newest

spark

Completed a read-only Spark skill-coverage audit: found two concrete documentation/coverage gaps (missing OPS_INDEX.md pointer target and Spark-specific runbook absence) and prepared actionable follow-up task drafts with evidence paths.

EXECUTION_STATUS: done RESULT_SUMMARY: I completed the Spark read-only coverage audit against role kernel docs and the coding-agent skill instructions; coverage is generally usable for bounded coding/ops support, but two material gaps remain: a missing referenced runbook index file and no Spark-specific execution playbook clarifying when Spark should use direct edits vs coding-agent delegation. GAP_MATRIX: - medium | Missing OPS index at referenced canonical path | /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/AGENTS.md (defers to OPS_INDEX.md), /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/BOOTSTRAP.md (defers to OPS_INDEX.md), read error ENOENT on /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/OPS_INDEX.md | Workers are instructed to resolve operation-specific rules via a file that is currently absent, increasing improvisation risk under pressure | Create/restore /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/OPS_INDEX.md with current ops map and verified links to active runbooks - medium | No Spark-specific runbook/skill for bounded coding-vs-ops decision gate | /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/AGENTS.md (Spark scope), available skills list (no Spark-specific role skill), /home/piet/.npm-global/lib/node_modules/openclaw/skills/coding-agent/SKILL.md (covers delegation mechanics but not Spark role decision boundaries) | Inconsistent execution choices and higher chance of over/under-delegation for Spark tasks | Add Spark role runbook defining intake triage, delegation thresholds, minimal verification gates, and receipt templates for small bounded tasks FOLLOW_UP_PROPOSALS: - Title: Restore canonical OPS_INDEX.md role-routing map Description: Recreate /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/OPS_INDEX.md with verified links to active ops runbooks used by AGENTS/BOOTSTRAP/HEARTBEAT references; include a quick "if missing" fallback policy and validate all linked paths exist. - Title: Add Spark bounded-task execution runbook Description: Create a Spark-specific operational guide (or skill) covering direct-edit vs coding-agent decision criteria, required verification gates by task type, escalation boundaries, and standard receipt language for result/blocked/failed. MUTATION_SCOPE: read-only SPRINTOUTCOME_JSON: {"schema_version":"v1.1","status":"done","metrics":{"duration_s":210,"tokens_in":1,"tokens_out":1,"cost_usd":0},"next_actions":["Restore canonical OPS_INDEX.md role-routing map","Add Spark bounded-task execution runbook"]}

A5

james

EXECUTION_STATUS: done RESULT_SUMMARY: Read-only Worker Skill-Coverage Audit for James/research completed. James has clear role routing and strong general Mission Control/worker guardrails, but research coverage is mostly generic: there is no dedicated research SKILL.md/runbook, the research template is minimal, verification gates for evidence quality are underspecified, and one startup checklist path conflicts with newer ground-truth docs. No files, config, services, restarts, secrets, or schedules were touched. GAP_MATRIX: - High | Missing dedicated James/research skill/runbook | evidence: no /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/skills/research/SKILL.md or /home/piet/.openclaw/skills/research/SKILL.md; AGENTS.md only maps James=research; docs/plan-templates/research.md is a tiny template | impact: research workers rely on generic behavior, increasing variance in source selection, citation quality, web/vault fallback, confidence scoring, and terminal receipt evidence | recommended_follow_up: create a read-only research-audit skill/runbook for James covering source hierarchy, QMD/web/direct-read fallback, citation/line evidence, confidence labels, and verification gates. - Medium | Research template too thin for recurring audits | evidence: docs/plan-templates/research.md only has Fragestellung/Quellen/Findings/Empfehlung placeholders | impact: no required sections for scope/anti-scope, source freshness, contradiction handling, limitations, or follow-up task drafting | recommended_follow_up: expand template or add a richer audit-report template for James tasks. - Medium | Retrieval guidance exists but is not connected to James role | evidence: OPS_INDEX.md routes QMD/Vault discovery to ops/qmd.md, but no James-specific doc tells research workers when to use QMD vs direct reads vs web search; QMD search for James research skill coverage returned no strong runbook | impact: workers may overuse ad-hoc find/grep or skip documented retrieval fallbacks | recommended_follow_up: add James research checklist referencing ops/qmd.md and direct-read rules. - Low | Startup checklist contains stale/ambiguous board-data path | evidence: WORKSPACE-GROUND-TRUTH.md says board/task data is /home/piet/.openclaw/state/mission-control/data, while docs/onboarding/WORKER-STARTUP-CHECKLIST.md says /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/mission-control/data | impact: new workers may inspect repo data instead of live state | recommended_follow_up: align startup checklist with ground truth. - Low | Existing James research artifacts are historical outputs, not operational coverage | evidence: docs/audits/MC-AUDIT-RESEARCH-JAMES.md and james-scope-governance-research-2026-04-19.md are research reports; they do not define current James execution gates | impact: useful examples may be mistaken for current operating instructions | recommended_follow_up: classify example reports as examples and link from a canonical James research runbook if useful. FOLLOW_UP_PROPOSALS: 1. Title: Add James Research Audit Skill/Runbook. Description: Create a read-only skill/runbook for James research tasks with source hierarchy, retrieval fallback, citation/evidence requirements, confidence scoring, freshness checks, contradiction handling, and terminal receipt checklist. 2. Title: Expand Research Report Template. Description: Upgrade docs/plan-templates/research.md with scope/anti-scope, evidence table, limitations, confidence, verification gate, and follow-up proposal fields. 3. Title: Fix Worker Startup Checklist board-data path. Description: Align docs/onboarding/WORKER-STARTUP-CHECKLIST.md with WORKSPACE-GROUND-TRUTH.md by pointing board/task live data to /home/piet/.openclaw/state/mission-control/data. MUTATION_SCOPE: read-only

Evidence inspected read-only: task detail via Mission Control API; /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/AGENTS.md; /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/BOOTSTRAP.md; /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/README.md; /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/CONTEXT_MAP.md; /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/HEARTBEAT.md; /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/docs/operations/WORKSPACE-GROUND-TRUTH.md; /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/docs/operations/agent-kernel/OPS_INDEX.md; /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/docs/operations/agent-kernel/ops/mission-control.md; /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/docs/operations/agent-kernel/ops/qmd.md; /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/docs/onboarding/WORKER-STARTUP-CHECKLIST.md; /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/docs/plan-templates/research.md; /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace/docs/audits/MC-AUDIT-RESEARCH-JAMES.md; /home/piet/.openclaw/workspace-james/vault/03-Agents/james-scope-governance-research-2026-04-19.md; find checks for research SKILL.md returned absent; QMD search for James research skill coverage returned no strong canonical runbook.

A5